Saturday 31 May 2014

Adam Hulin, Undue Leniency & No Justice.

 
 
Adam Hulin
 
"A TEENAGER plied a 12-year-old girl with vodka so he could sexually assault her on the back seat of his car, a court heard. Adam Hulin, of Hurst Lane, Headley, appeared for trial at Guildford Crown Court this week, accused of raping the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in December 2012. The 19-year-old admitted driving the alleged victim to several locations in Bookham and performing sex acts with her, but denied having sexual intercourse and said he believed her to be aged 16. Opening the case for the prosecution on Monday, Alan Gardner said: "In the middle of 2012, Hulin added the girl as a friend on social media site Facebook. "During conversations they had on Facebook, he asked what school year she was in and, after answering she was in Year 7, his response was 'cute'. It is the prosecution's case that Hulin was well aware of her age."
 
 
"A MAN has been sentenced to a community order for performing sexual acts with a 12-year-old girl.
Adam Hulin of Hurst Lane, Headley, avoided prison despite admitting charges of oral rape of a child under 13 and assault of a child under 13 by penetration. In addition to the 12-month community order handed down at Guildford Crown Court on Wednesday (April 23), the 19-year-old was ordered to carry out 100 hours of unpaid work and attend six sessions on his attitude towards sexual encounters. A custodial term is within the sentencing council's guidelines for the offences he committed."
 
"He was found neither guilty or not guilty of this charge, after the jury was discharged and the judge heard evidence alone in what is known as a Newton hearing. During this hearing the judge accepted Hulin’s defence that at the time of the encounter he believed the girl was 16. It was decided the rape charge would remain on file. Mitigating at the sentencing hearing, Richard McConaghy said Hulin had engaged in what he had believed was “what most people would ordinarily define as regular sexual activity”. He added: “This incident took place in December 2012 and the complainant in this matter turned 13 in February 2013. If this incident had taken place three months later then, because of the matter for which Mr Hulin is now being sentenced, he would have had a complete defence of law. “It is simply to do with the fact that she was a couple of months shy of her 13th birthday that Mr Hulin finds himself subject to the law at all.”
 
 
"Convicted oral child rapist Adam Hulin will not take part in any sex offenders’ treatment programme it has emerged - even though sentencing guidelines say this should happen when a judge decides not to impose a jail  term. Hulin, 19, of Hookwood Cottages, in Hurst Lane, Headley, was given 100 hours of community service, a £60 victim surcharge and the requirement to attend six community reintegration sessions after pleading guilty to oral rape and sexual assault of a 12-year-old girl in Bookham in December 2012. The talented runner was only put on the Sex Offenders' Register for five years after he was sentenced by the judge Recorder George Lawson-Rogers QC at Guildford Crown Court last month. Last week, the Solicitor General Oliver Heald QC MP decided that the sentence handed to Hulin would not be reviewed - despite calls from the victim’s family and others who believed it was unduly lenient."
 
You seriously couldn't make this up. 
 
Knew she was about 12 by the fact he asked her what year she was in (year 7 = first year at secondary school). Yet somehow the judge was seemingly duped into believing that he believed she was 16! How does that work? There is more than a little difference between a 12 year old child & a 16 year old teenager - surely no-one could ever fall for that? Maybe a 14 or 15 year old, but a 12 year old?  
 
And what of the comments made by Barrister Richard McConaghy?
 
"This incident took place in December 2012 and the complainant in this matter turned 13 in February 2013. If this incident had taken place three months later then, because of the matter for which Mr Hulin is now being sentenced, he would have had a complete defence of law. “It is simply to do with the fact that she was a couple of months shy of her 13th birthday that Mr Hulin finds himself subject to the law at all.”
 
Am I missing something blindingly obvious here, or am I being incredibly stupid in assuming that by Law, the age of consent in the UK is 16, not 13? Children of 12 / 13 cannot consent. New guidelines published this year, as explained here include the following excert:
 
"The guideline makes it clear that victims are not responsible for what has happened to them. This is particularly emphasised in relation to offences committed against children. In the previous guideline there were child sex offences labelled as involving ‘ostensible consent’ – that is, where a child over 13 has apparently agreed to sexual activity. The Council believes that this is the wrong way of looking at these offences as children do not consent to their own abuse. The new guideline therefore looks more at the offender’s actions and behaviour towards the victim" So again, what is this Barrister going on about?
 
Unfortunately, appeals to the AG as Unduly lenient (yes I did appeal this case) where the AG decides not to review, cannot be re-appealed. It seems then, that for this "talented athlete" (not that this has anything to do with these offences), for sexually assaulting and orally raping a 12 year old child after plying her with vodka, a sentence of 100 hours community service, a £60 victim surcharge and 6 community reintegration sessions (which are NOT designed for sexual offences) is an appropriate sentence! Believe it or not. British Justice at its best again.

4 comments:

  1. Wow

    The evidence shows that Hulin knew what age the child was before he orally raped and penetrated her
    "During conversations they had on Facebook, he asked what school year she was in and, after answering she was in Year 7, his response was 'cute'.


    Alcohol is a drug and there are reasons why there are laws to restrict children's access to it.
    www.gov.uk/alcohol-young-people-law .........."If you’re under 18, it is against the law ....for an adult to buy or try to buy alcohol for you"

    But Adam Hulin used alcohol to facilitate his drug rape of a child

    There are reasons why the age of consent is set at 16.
    This girl was not a few months shy of 16. She was 12 !!!!!!!

    This judge appears a little confused about some of the relevant facts and about the law on the age of consent.

    This is not about baying for blood and wanting to persecute a reformed young man who made a mistake. I did a google on Adam Hulin and it appears that he is something of a minor celebrity. Amongst other things which popped up was his instagram page:

    http://instagram.com/adamhulin_

    adamhulin_ [3,609 followers]
    ^Verified Account^ ▪️Adam Hulin ▪️UK ���� London ▪️Part-time athlete ▪️Full-time motivator�� ▪️Worry about your own life ▪️Justice prevailed. Now leave�� http://caseyhendrickson.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/girls-who-lie-about-their-age-should-be-charged-with-sex-crime/

    Very interesting. Not exactly an expression of contrition by a young man prepared to take responsibility for his own actions and the repercussions of his drug rape of a child. Rather an arrogant self promotion and self justification, with his link to the caseyhendrickson webpage indicating that he sees himself as the victim and is labelling the 12 year old child as the perpetrator.

    Well done judge Recorder George Lawson-Rogers QC and Solicitor General Oliver Heald QC (Member of Parliament for North East Hertfordshire)

    ReplyDelete
  2. He did not know the age of the girl, you are deluded. The so called "Facebook conversation" was proved to have never happened, it was just part of the girls statement which later was proven to be riddled with lies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Link?

      Did not know the difference between a 12 year old & a 16 year old?

      Do you?

      Delete
  3. www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/a2062608-Judges-comments-on-sexual-assault-rape

    ReplyDelete